|
Post by valryn on Jan 11, 2008 10:37:31 GMT -5
Any theories on a good build for this type of Rogue? Just curious...
|
|
|
Post by taallonn on Jan 18, 2008 2:54:03 GMT -5
This is what I was gearing my rogue towards when I quit playing......It is a stun lock build mostly for swords or maces as it doesn't use backstab at all. Though I haven't played in a long time so a pure Assassin build maybe ok
Rogue Talents Minimum Required Level: 70 Required Talent Points: 61
Assassination Talents - 30 point(s)
# Improved Eviscerate - rank 3/3 # Remorseless Attacks - rank 1/2 # Malice - rank 5/5 # Ruthlessness - rank 3/3 # Murder - rank 2/2 # Relentless Strikes - rank 1/1 # Lethality - rank 5/5 # Cold Blood - rank 1/1 # Improved Kidney Shot - rank 3/3 # Quick Recovery - rank 1/2 # Seal Fate - rank 5/5
Combat Talents - 31 point(s)
# Improved Gouge - rank 3/3 # Improved Sinister Strike - rank 2/2 # Improved Slice and Dice - rank 3/3 # Deflection - rank 5/5 # Precision - rank 5/5 # Riposte - rank 1/1 # Dual Wield Specialization - rank 5/5 # Blade Flurry - rank 1/1 # Blade Twisting - rank 2/2 # Weapon Expertise - rank 2/2 # Aggression - rank 1/3 # Adrenaline Rush - rank 1/1
|
|
|
Post by taallonn on Jan 18, 2008 3:02:56 GMT -5
I guess if you wanted to go dagger/backstab spec you could do something like this.......
Rogue Talents Minimum Required Level: 70 Required Talent Points: 61
Assassination Talents - 30 point(s)
# Improved Eviscerate - rank 2/3 # Malice - rank 5/5 # Ruthlessness - rank 3/3 # Murder - rank 2/2 # Improved Backstab - rank 3/3 # Lethality - rank 5/5 # Cold Blood - rank 1/1 # Improved Kidney Shot - rank 3/3 # Quick Recovery - rank 1/2 # Seal Fate - rank 5/5
Combat Talents - 26 point(s)
# Improved Gouge - rank 3/3 # Lightning Reflexes - rank 5/5 # Improved Slice and Dice - rank 3/3 # Deflection - rank 2/5 # Precision - rank 5/5 # Dagger Specialization - rank 3/5 # Dual Wield Specialization - rank 5/5
Subtlety Talents - 5 point(s)
# Opportunity - rank 5/5
|
|
|
Post by valryn on Feb 18, 2008 1:18:33 GMT -5
Sweet thanks. I'll look into that...
|
|